May the city of Cannes

Posted on 2007-05-27

For 12 days in May the city of Cannes is transformed from a quiet seaside resort into the entire focus of the international film industry. Over 200,000 people - filmmakers, film fans, and star-gazers alike - descend on the Croisette to take part in the Cannes Film Festival (or more correctly, the Festival de Cannes). During these two weeks thousands of films are screened, careers are made (and ruined), and stars from all over the world gather to bask in the limelight.

Ever since the early 1950s, when a bikini-clad Brigitte Bardot frolicked on the beach for the cameras, Cannes has grown to embody two of the world's favourite pastimes: sex and cinema. Now easily the most famous film festival of them all, the mere mention of Cannes conjures up images of red carpets, palm trees, scantily-clad starlets, the blinding flashes of a million paparazzi cameras, and of course, celebrity parties.

"What an incredible selection of films you put together, your selection of films and diversity of countries represented was excellent-- as well as a personal testament to your passion and practical ability to deliver so complex an event on a recurring basis."
"Thank you for the hospitality and incredible effort on your part to have everything run smoothly and efficiently." "I really had a sensational time! Everyone couldn't have been nicer and more accommodating. Good by Cannes for another year!!

KAVALIER TO 'COME BACK TOGETHER'

Posted on 2007-05-21

"The production designer had taken his kids out of school in LA and was ready to move to London where the principal interiors were going to be shot," Chabon said. "And then last fall it all fell apart. I'm not entirely sure why; I'm not privy to the inside information, but my sense is that the studio (Paramount) underwent one of those financial panics that studios are regularly prey to, and many plugs were pulled--including K&C's."

"Oh, well, that's showbiz,"

Nevertheless, Chabon said producer Scott Rudin "assures me that there is no reason to despair and that it will all come back together again."

"I have no reason at all not to believe him," he said.

 

Cannes Film Festival 2007

Posted on 2007-05-20

For twelve days in the month of May, the city of Cannes is transformed from a quiet seaside resort into the hub of the international film industry and it is precisely this glamour and wide ranged popularity, which makes Cannes ‘the' name among other film conglomerations.

Considered the world's most important film festival, the 60th Annual Cannes Film Festival will be held from the 16th to the 27th of May. Best known as the festival of celebrity hedonism, the festival this year will witness, what is customary to the Cannes- glittering repertoire of stars and a wide canvas of films from all across the world.

The festival also known as ‘le Festival de Cannes' is held annually in the town of Cannes in south of France, especially known for its ‘sunshine and enchanting setting'. In fact, the picturesque town noted for its gorgeous sandy beaches has come up in the world map for it nestling the prestigious festival.

It was in 1939 that the French Minister, Jean Zay proposed the creation of an international film event at Cannes. The first festival was scheduled for September 1939, but World War II caused its postponement to September 1946. Although planned as an annual event, it was not held in 1948 or 1950 because of budgetary problems. In the early 1950s it was decided to hold the event in the spring to take advantage of the lovely weather on the French Riviera during that season. Also in the 1950s, the festival secured its reputation as the exhibitor of the cream of cinema, and became more of an actual competition than a ‘film forum'.

Today, the festival is unanimously recognised as ‘The leader of the ‘Big Five' international film festivals' which includes Venice, Berlin, Sundance, and Toronto; involving a huge budget which amounts to approximately 20 million Euros, half of which originates from public funding. This financing is completed by contributions from a number of professional and institutional groups along with the festival`s official partners.

Cannes Film Festival 2007 (World Premiere)

Posted on 2007-05-17

Wong Kar-Wai's first English language feature, "My Blueberry Nights," the Opening Night of the 60th Cannes Festival, is a decidedly mixed bag, a film that lacks the brilliance and mood of his Hong Kong Pictures but nonetheless bears some artistic merits, particularly to viewers unfamiliar with his oeuvre.

Reportedly, the programmers' selection marks the first time in Cannes' history that a film by a Chinese director has kicked off the festival.

Mediocre and old fashioned are not words associated with Wong Kar-wai's work ("Happy Together," "In the Mood for Love," "2046") and yet they quite accurately describe his first foray into genre cinema, in this case a road movie, femme-dominated, shot entirely shot in the U.S.

Neither exciting nor disappointing, "My Blueberry Nights" is sharply uneven: The yarn has a decent beginning and a weak second reel, but then it improves considerably, ending on an emotionally satisfying, if also too predictable and symmetrical manner.

Wong's hardcore fans may be disappointed by his new film, which lacks the unique signature of his good Hong Kong films. "My Blueberry Night" was clearly made with an eye on the marketplace in an effort to increase the appeal of a director, who so far has been a critics darling but little-known to lay audiences outside the global art house circuit.

It's often hard to assess a film's commercial prospects (how it will play with lay audiences) by its first press screening but judging by the tame response this morning (not much applause, but no boos either), it's safe to predict that the Weinstein Co. (which has the movie in the US) will face a challenge in putting this picture over with mainstream audiences.

First, the good news. Unlike many foreign art directors (Chen Kaige, Lars von Trier, and others), Wong Kar-wai has not made an embarrassing English-language feature debut. However, like other art directors (Atom Egoyan is a prime example), Wong proves that it's not easy to morph from moody, contemplative, personal filmmaking into a more conventional generic cinema. "My Blueberry Nights," no matter, how you look at it, is a genre film par excellence, with the expected narrative structure, typical characters, iconography, and physical settings .

Wong tries to imbue the yarn of a disenchanted waitresses (nicely played by Norah Jones, who's extremely photogenic and likable) with personal and stylistic flourishes, but he can't really conceal the fact that the narrative and all of the characters are familiar and conventional, from the lead waitress in search of identity and happiness, all the way to the secondary characters she encounters in her odyssey toward self-empowerment.

What makes the compromised picture more enjoyable to watch is the stellar cast that alongside music diva Norah Jones includes Jude Law, David Strathairn, Rachel Weisz, and best of all, Natalie Portman.

The tale begins and ends in New York City, at a cafe-bakery owned by Jeremy (Jude Law), a sensitive Brit from Manchester with a chip on his shoulder and a penchant for philosophizing about his customers-particularly the disillusioned types, those who tend to leave their keys in his place, which he later places in a big jar.

Every day, a young beautiful woman named Elizabeth (Jones) comes in and orders a slice of blueberry pie, then sits and gazes out the window. One night, she tells Jeremy her story: a man she thought she could never live without has left her. After that, Elizabeth disappears, though not before falling asleep at the counter and Jeremy's erotic gesture to clean up her messy lips (covered with vanilla ice scream!), while she's asleep (remember this detail).

Jeremy discovers that Elizabeth has left town, setting off on a long journey towards a new beginning. But as the voice-over informs us: People who leave and pretend to get lost expect to be found. Along the way, she befriends various people (played by David Strathairn, Rachel Weisz and Natalie Portman, among others) with problems and dilemmas of their own. For a while, Wong keeps a consistent gaze and nearly everything that we see is from Elizabeth's subjective POV.

Spanning almost a year, structurally, the film is divided into chapters, such as Day 1 or Day 57 or Day 300, with titles indicating the mileage (in kilometers, too) that Elizabeth has traveled. Once she hits the road, Elizabeth makes major stops in Memphis, Nevada, and Vegas, before returning to New York as a different, more self-aware, or at least less naïve, woman.

The Memphis chapter is rather dull, because it's defined by an uninteresting story: The painful break-up of a drunk, disenchanted cop (Straithairn), who can't accept the fact that his wife (Weisz) had left him for another man. Frequenting nightly the bar where Elizabeth works, he washes down his pain with eight or nine whiskeys, deluding himself that this is his last night of drinking.

You could say that Strathairn's character is doomed and, indeed, once his fate is sealed, we get to know his wife's side of the story. After s series of hysterical confrontations, in which the gifted Weisz is overacting in big drunk scenes (Hollywood style), there are some quieter and more touching moments between her and Elizabeth.

The female bonding and camaraderie that Elizabeth develops with Weisz and then with Natalie Portman becomes a motif of the movie, recalling other road pictures about waitresses, such as Scorsese's "Alice Doesn't Live Here Any More" (with Ellen Burstyn) and Ridley Scott's "Thelma and Louise" (With Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis).

The movie is at its liveliest in the next to last reel, in which Elizabeth meets and befriends a cocky gambler and con artist (Natalie Portman, rendering the film's best performance), who tries to teach Elizabeth her tricks of the trade, only to realize that there's a lesson or two she herself could learn from her presumably naïve and too trusting companion.

What lends the narrative some complexity are the shifting perspectives and POVs. Like many of Wong's films, "My Blueberry Nights" is accompanied by voice-over narration. We go back and forth between Jeremy and Elizabeth's sides of the story-and efforts to connect.

What doesn't work as well, and slows down the narrative, which is not terribly exciting in the first place, are the postcards that Jeremy and Elizabeth write to each other and are read loud. The text of the postcards, and some the voice-overs, is too simple, and often banal, failing to add extra layers of meaning or emotionality to the proceedings.

Despite narrative shortcoming, the picture is nice to look at. Shot across the U.S. in New York, Memphis, Nevada and along the legendary Route 66, the film features Wong's trademark visual flair, courtesy of his gifted lenser Darius Khondji and regular art designer and editor, William Chang.

If this intimate noirish tale of love and self-discovery is ultimately disappointing, it's due to our familiarity with the saga and its characters. None of the persona is eccentric or colorful enough to sustain our attention, let alone engage our emotions.

And to the burning question: Can Norah Jones act? Absolutely. Endowed with a strong, charismatic presence, Jones is photogenic, and Wong, having worked with some of the most beautiful actresses in world cinema today (Maggie Cheung, Gong Li, among them) gives her the full-star treatment, with close-ups and mega close-ups. With additional acting experience, Jones could develop into an A-list dramatic actress.

About Wong Kar-Wai

Wong Kar-Wai is an award-winning writer/director whose unique style has influenced a generation of filmmakers. His acclaimed work includes the art house hits "In the Mood for Love," "Happy Together" (which earned him the Best Director Award at the 1997 Cannes Film Festival), "Chungking Express," and "2046."

"My Blueberry Nights" is a Block 2 Pictures presentation of a Jet Tone Films Production. The screenplay, based on a story by Wong Kar Wai, was written by Wong and Lawrence Block. The Director of Photography is Darius Khondji and the Production Designer and Editor is William Chang.

 

The Lost Painting

Posted on 2007-05-11

Sure, The DaVinci Code may have not have been the gangbuster that was promised. There were some protests, there were some cries of blasphemy ... but really it was just kind of a dud. Money was to be made, however, and it looks like there is at least some residual "Dan Brown"-ish material left lurking in development.

Variety has announced that Miramax has optioned The Lost Painting: The Quest for a Caravaggio Masterpiece by Jonathan Harr. This non-fiction book follows the search for the painting "The Taking of the Christ" a masterpiece assumed to be lost but was found in an Irish monastery. The book alsocovers the career and times of the painter Caravaggio, who was a bit of a bad boy in the art world. Christopher Monger will adapt the screenplay but there is no word on a star or director yet.

The movie plans on taking a more forensic route to art history, as opposed to The Da Vinci Code's conspiracy-mongering. ...

Jonathan Harr's "The Lost Painting" is a deft reworking of factual information associated with the discovery of a painting, long thought to be lost, by the Italian Baroque master Caravaggio. Harr skillfully reconstructs the complex series of events that led to the painting's resurrection. His book reads like a detective story, only his characters aren't driven by greed, lust or revenge, but by their passion for art. This passion takes on an identity of its own in the story and becomes the prime mover behind the search.

 

Numerous copies of Caravaggio's "The Taking of Christ" ("La Presa di Gieusu Cristo") had surfaced over the centuries, but most scholars believed that the original was lost, as were many of Caravaggio's paintings. The painting depicts the very moment in the Garden of Gethsemane when Judas, accompanied by soldiers, leans in to give Jesus Christ the kiss of betrayal. Caravaggio's trademark use of light leads the viewer's eye to the face of Christ, who looks down in resignation and revulsion, as he offers his cheek for the kiss but seems to pull back as well.

 

The discovery of "The Taking of Christ" occurs largely by accident. Harr's narrative suggests that in a sense the painting wants to be found. The labyrinthine trail begins when two graduate students in art history at the University of Rome are enlisted to research which of two paintings of St. John the Baptist has the better claim to being the Caravaggio original. During their search, Francesca Cappelletti and Laura Testa receive permission to use a dusty, half-forgotten archive, housed in the basement of a country house belonging to the descendants of the once illustrious Mattei family, well known patrons of Caravaggio.

 

The young women spend days in the dimly lit basement archive, sifting through the exhaustive account books and inventories kept by the Mattei family. During their research, they discover that in 1802 a Scotsman named Hamilton Nisbet bought from the family a painting corresponding in size and subject to "The Taking of Christ," but in the account books the work is attributed to a Dutch painter named Honthorst. They realize that although the error might have been inadvertent, it's more likely that Hamilton Nisbet's agent wanted the painting to seem less valuable to save his client some money. "The less consequential the paintings, the easier it was to get them out of the country, and the lower the export duties."

 

Harr's account of this research accurately conveys how unexpected factors can dramatically alter even the most reliable looking evidence. Good researchers must interpret the information they find and always be aware of circumstances that can significantly influence their conclusions. His account also paints a vivid picture of the kind of intimacy that evolves between a researcher and a research subject. Francesca cannot abandon the lead she uncovers. She follows the trail to London and to Edinburgh but eventually reaches a dead end.

 

At roughly the same time, an Italian-born art restorer named Sergio Benedetti is working at the National Gallery of Ireland in Dublin. Benedetti, a devoted fan of Caravaggio's work, can hold intelligent conversations, even with formally trained scholars, on the topic of his favorite artist. In the late summer of 1990, he accompanies the assistant director of the National Gallery to the St. Ignatius Residence, home to 14 Jesuit priests, a 10-minute walk from the gallery. The rector of St. Ignatius wants to know how much it will cost to have some paintings cleaned and restored.

Benedetti recognizes immediately that one of the paintings in question could be the lost Caravaggio. He becomes the central figure, sometimes admirable, sometimes not, in the unfolding of the remainder of the story. Without his knowledge and keen eye, as well as some pure dumb luck, the painting may never have come to light. The arduous and time-consuming task of restoring the painting falls to Benedetti. He must reline the canvas to compensate for sagging caused by gravity over the years, and he must choose just the right solvent to remove layers of grime and grease. He does not always choose wisely, sometimes falling prey to his own impatience and pride.

The painting is eventually authenticated. With his "nose to the canvas," world-renowned Caravaggio scholar Denis Mahon confirms that Benedetti's guess is correct. The presence of ghostly images, called pentimenti, beneath the paint helps to establish the painting's authenticity. Because they indicate where the artist changed his mind about the placement of some element, a copy does not contain them. In "The Taking of Christ," found at the St. Ignatius Residence, a pentimento of Judas' ear is evident.

The National Gallery does not go public with its find until November of 1993, and only after negotiating an agreement with the Jesuits. In the intervening three years the art community is rife with rumors about the lost painting. Harr creates a vivid picture of the insular world of scholarly endeavor, including the passions, petty jealousies, odd alliances and open conflicts that it often gives birth to.

When Francesca Cappelletti comes to the celebration planned for the unveiling of the painting and sees the actual picture for the first time, she responds emotionally as well as intellectually. "Close up she could see individual brushstrokes and the texture of the canvas, the fragile reality of the painting," but she also "felt herself drawn into the drama of the scene.... She forgot, for a moment, that she was looking at a painting."

The people in Harr's story are all real. However, in his narrative they become puppets, manipulated by an unseen force, a shadowy deity of lost art or painstaking research determined to remind us all that a work of art's worth does not lie in its monetary value, but in the deeper responses it can engender.

"A Tale of Love and Darkness"

Posted on 2007-05-05

  

The weekend before we set off for Israel. In Soho, New York. Nat Mun, Nat and me, Oh and charlie. The day we left for Israel. Nat could not see, she needed a lift.


Natalie Portman said that she loves Israel, despite her difficulties in being a Hollywood celebrity there. The Jerusalem-born film star said that she visits Israel from her home in the United States at least three or four times a year.

Portman may spend more time in Israel if she makes good on tentative plans to direct and act in a film adaptation of Amos Oz's memoir "A Tale of Love and Darkness."

"A Tale of Love and Darkness" if it is brought to the big screen, Jerusalem Capital Studios spokesman Danny Levy have met with Portman to discuss the possibility of her participating in and directing a film version of the book," he said. "A Tale of Love and Darkness" describes Oz's upbringing in Jerusalem amid the fighting during which the Jewish state was founded. Israeli media said Portman was interested in playing Oz's mother, who committed suicide when the author was a youth. Portman was born in Jerusalem and speaks Hebrew. In 2005 she appeared in "Free Zone," a road movie by Israeli director. The story of a boy growing up in the war-torn Jerusalem of the forties and fifties, in a small apartment crowded with books in twelve languages and relatives speaking nearly as many. His mother and father, both wonderful people, were ill-suited to each other. When Oz was twelve and a half years old, his mother committed suicide, a tragedy that was to change his life. He leaves the constraints of the family and the community of dreamers, scholars, and failed businessmen and joins a kibbutz, changes his name, marries, has children, and finally becomes a writer as well as an active participant in the political life of Israel.


It is not every day that one of the world's master storytellers turns the microscope on himself and unflinchingly examines the wellsprings of his personal and creative life. Amos Oz, Israel's best-known and possibly most accomplished novelist and political essayist, has done just that in this superbly crafted and profoundly moving memoir.

His mother's suicide, when he was just 12 years old, is the harrowing "tale of darkness" that lies at the core of Oz's story. It left him hurt, angry, betrayed and, above all, full of guilt and self-loathing: "All mothers love their children," he writes, "that's a law of nature. Even a cat or a goat. Even mothers of criminals and murderers. Even mothers of Nazis. . . . The fact that only I couldn't be loved, that my mother had run away from me, only proved that there was nothing in me to love, that I didn't deserve love."

Fortunately for Oz, he was not engulfed by that darkness, nor has he allowed it to cloud his work. Indeed, there is a great deal more love than darkness, both in his fiction and in this life-affirming memoir.

Oz recreates, with bitter-sweet nostalgia, the pre-1948 Jewish-Arab Jerusalem he grew up in as the only child of two deeply unhappy, misplaced immigrants, Aryeh and Fania Klausner. This was home until, about two years after his mother's suicide, he went to live on a kibbutz - the iconic creation of the self-assured, muscular new Jew, as far removed as is imaginable from the claustrophobic intellectual-immigrant world of his parents. He even rejected his Diaspora-Jewish name Klausner in favour of Oz, Hebrew for "strength, force, boldness".

Characteristically, he learned to recognise that this "old Jew/new Jew" dichotomy is a false one. Indeed, it is a leitmotif that runs through Oz's work that obsession with polarity of any kind - Israel/Diaspora, Jew/Arab, and even, perhaps especially, man/woman - is both reductive and destructive. His task as a writer is to explore the common ground, to seek the self in the other, the other in the self.

We meet dozens of marvellous characters, each drawn with the economy, insight and gentle irony that are hallmarks of Oz's storytelling.

His mother Fania, hardly surprisingly, occupies centre stage as, seeking the roots of his family tragedy, Oz traces the trajectory that took her from her idealistic girlhood in an increasingly hostile Poland to the dark basement flat in Jerusalem where she sunk deeper and deeper into her final, fatal depression.

She is portrayed as the tragic victim of a failed, perhaps impossible, Zionist dream: "My mother grew up surrounded by an angelic cultural vision of misty beauty whose wings were finally dashed on a hot dusty pavement of Jerusalem stone."

Poles apart from his tragic mother is his wife of 45 years, Nily - the vivacious, always-singing epicentre of light and joy in his life: "the clapper in the bell" - who he met on the kibbutz and who restored and has sustained his belief in the capacity to love, and be loved.

Then there is his Grandma Shlomit, who took one horrified look at the hot, dirty, smelly, raucous Palestine she arrived in as a reluctant refugee in 1933, and pronounced: "The Levant is full of germs."

For the rest of her life she doused everything with Lysol and took three hot baths a day to keep the germ-filled Levant at bay; she died some 25 years later - in her bath! As if there weren't any germs in the Europe she had escaped from, Oz comments wryly, "not to mention all sorts of other noxious things".

There are some moments of high farce, as when Oz recounts how Menachem Begin, former leader of the Irgun underground and hero of his staunchly right-wing family, complained at a public meeting in Jerusalem, shortly after Israel was born, that while the world was rushing to "arm" the new state's Arab enemies, no one was willing to "arm" Israel. "If only I were prime minister today," Begin declaimed, "everyone, everyone, would be arming us! Ev-ery-one!!!"

Unfortunately, Begin, who had learnt his somewhat bombastic Hebrew in his native Poland, used the archaic word "lezayen" for the verb "to arm". To young Amos's ears, attuned to the much less formal vernacular Hebrew of his native-born generation, the word lezayen had another meaning entirely: "to fuck".

To the horror of his family, as silence descended on the hall, he burst into uncontrollable laughter and his mortified grandfather had to drag him out by his ear. So ended any attachment Oz might have had to his family's right-wing political allegiances.

Much more sombre is his harrowing account of another epiphany: a childhood visit to the home of a prominent Arab family, the Silwanis, in east Jerusalem. The young Amos, then about eight, was sent out to play in the garden with the children.

Conscious of his role as representative of the Jewish People Come Home to Zion, he was determined to demonstrate to his Arab hosts - especially the comely 12-year-old Aisha and her little brother Awwad - what a fine fellow he was. He regaled them with his culture and erudition, reciting the poems of Zionism's leading poets (including one of his own) before going on to demonstrate that this New Jew could not only recite poetry, but could climb trees, too.

"Trembling with the thrill of national representativity," he scaled the large mulberry tree in the Silwani garden. At the top he found an old iron ball attached to a rusty chain. Grabbing hold of the chain, he whirled the ball in wild circles around his head, whooping loudly. "Now at last was muscular Judaism taking the stage, making resplendent new Hebrew youth at the height of his powers, making everyone who sees him tremble at his roar; like a lion among lions."

Then disaster struck. The rusty chain snapped and the heavy iron ball hurtled earthward. It just missed smashing the skull of three-year-old Awwad, but slammed into his foot, crushing it.

Oz remembers little of the mayhem that followed, but indelibly etched in his consciousness was the look of "loathing, despair, horror and flashing hatred" that the little boy's sister, Aisha, gave him. The seed was sown of his deep and abiding revulsion for chauvinism of any sort - that mindless, corrosive national self-assertiveness that denies the other and crushes not only the body but the soul of victim and perpetrator alike.

Ultimately, Oz is, above all else, a wonderfully perceptive and sensitive chronicler of human emotion - something he can capture and convey in a few simple words. Thus his touching description of how he reacts when his wife Nily responds favourably to his work: "When she likes something, she looks up from the page and gives me a certain look, and the room gets bigger." So too, when one reads a book like this, does the reader's.

 

PARIS,JE T'AIME

Posted on 2007-05-04

Standing out among the riffraff, the Hollywood Slut Brigade, the vacuous tartlets who think they can act, small but still tall among her filthy celebrity peers is Natalie Portman.

Last night at the premiere of Paris, Je t'aime... she is, as you can see, indescribably beautiful. So beautiful she can make turned out feet tolerable which, as you know, is no mean feat.

Even more impressive though is her attitude. Her interest beyond partying and shopping and living to be photographed. Some people claim it, others actually live it. And Natalie Portman lives it. Natalie Portman is educated, she chose school, she is informed and involved and gives back... and she agreed to go on a talk show to talk about something other than herself.

shocking, non?

 

Natalie on The View the other day, promoting an organisation that provides loans to women living in poverty - helping them help themselves, the key word being loan. 95% of the women end up repaying their loans, so that the money recycles in perpetuity, with more and more women benefiting from the program.

 

An amazing concept, an inspiring initiative, and the way she talks about it - article and passionate - is infectious - nice to know they're not ALL worthless, don't you think?

short introduction

Posted on 2007-05-02

 

 

Someone suggested that I write a short introduction of myself for people who don't know me very well. Reading it would give the first-time visitor a few key points of context that could only otherwise be gotten by wading through a lot of archived posts. This is that introduction.

Nationality: British. Born: London, Career: 1968s-clapper boy at Gainsborough Studios; at the end of that year I left for the USA.

I now live in Sea Cliff, Long Island, New York, (USA).Though I am originally worked most of my live in Hollywood, but I consider New York my home. I have lived here for over ten years and I rather like it, especially in fall. I am 58 years old. I hold a bachelor of science in psychology from California Coast University, and a master of arts in educational psychology from California State University. Presently I am enrolled in another masters program at New York University, this time for computing. (PhD? Bah. To get one you have to learn more and more about less and less until you finally know everything about nothing.)

I still work in the film industry as a professional cinematographer nerd.  DOP, Cameraman 1st and 2nd or a Gaffer lighting management system. I also am on a teaching program about teaching, people about technology, this is one of my favorite things to do, and thus I try to educate students and faculty about the ways in which computers can enhance teaching and learning. I am also generally fascinated with the social implications of internet communication.

I have a small still-camera collection. I have fondness for traditional film photography and its associated accouterments. I like to read, I like to cook and I also like digital photography. I am now building a desk-top computer.

 

Created with ShoutPost